# Second (basic) tutorial¶

## The H2 molecule, with convergence studies.¶

This tutorial aims at showing how to get converged values for the following physical properties:

• the bond length
• the atomisation energy

You will learn about the numerical quality of the calculations, then make convergence studies with respect to the number of planewaves and the size of the supercell, and finally consider the effect of the XC functional. The problems related to the use of different pseudopotential are not examined. You will also finish to read the abinit help file.

This tutorial should take about 1 hour.

Note

Supposing you made your own installation of ABINIT, the input files to run the examples are in the ~abinit/tests/ directory where ~abinit is the absolute path of the abinit top-level directory. If you have NOT made your own install, ask your system administrator where to find the package, especially the executable and test files.

In case you work on your own PC or workstation, to make things easier, we suggest you define some handy environment variables by executing the following lines in the terminal:

export ABI_HOME=Replace_with_absolute_path_to_abinit_top_level_dir # Change this line
export PATH=$ABI_HOME/src/98_main/:$PATH      # Do not change this line: path to executable
export ABI_TESTS=$ABI_HOME/tests/ # Do not change this line: path to tests dir export ABI_PSPDIR=$ABI_TESTS/Psps_for_tests/  # Do not change this line: path to pseudos dir


Examples in this tutorial use these shell variables: copy and paste the code snippets into the terminal (remember to set ABI_HOME first!) or, alternatively, source the set_abienv.sh script located in the ~abinit directory:

source ~abinit/set_abienv.sh


The ‘export PATH’ line adds the directory containing the executables to your PATH so that you can invoke the code by simply typing abinit in the terminal instead of providing the absolute path.

To execute the tutorials, create a working directory (Work*) and copy there the input files of the lesson.

Most of the tutorials do not rely on parallelism (except specific tutorials on parallelism). However you can run most of the tutorial examples in parallel with MPI, see the topic on parallelism.

## Summary of the previous tutorial¶

We studied the H$_2$ molecule in a big box. We used 10 Ha as cut-off energy, a 10x10x10 Bohr$^3$ supercell, the local-density approximation (as well as the local-spin-density approximation) in the Perdew-Wang parametrization (ixc = -1012) and a pseudopotential from the pseudodojo http://www.pseudo-dojo.org/.

At this stage, we compared our results:

• bond length: 1.486 Bohr
• atomisation energy at that bond length: 0.1704 Ha = 4.635 eV

with the experimental data (as well as theoretical data using a much more accurate technique than DFT)

• bond length: 1.401 Bohr
• atomisation energy: 4.747 eV

The bond length is rather bad (about 6% off), and the atomisation energy is a bit too low, 2.5% off.

## 2 The convergence in ecut (I)¶

2.1.a Computing the bond length and corresponding atomisation energy in one run.

Before beginning, you might consider to work in a different subdirectory as for tutorial 1. Why not Work2?

Because we will compute many times the bond length and atomisation energy, it is worth to make a single input file that will do all the associated operations. You should try to use 2 datasets (try to combine $ABI_TESTS/tutorial/Input/tbase1_3.abi with tbase1_5.abi). Do not try to have the same position of the H atom as one of the H$_2$ atoms in the optimized geometry. cd$ABI_TESTS/tutorial/Input
mkdir Work2
cd Work2
cp ../tbase2_1.abi .


The input file tbase2_1.abi is an example of file that will do the job,

while tbase2_1.abo is an example of output file:

Execute the code with:

abinit tbase2_1.abi > log &


The run should take less than one minute.

You should obtain the values:

       etotal1    -1.1182883137E+00
etotal2    -4.7393103688E-01


and

        xcart1    -7.4307169181E-01  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00
7.4307169181E-01  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00


These are similar to those determined in tutorial 1, although they have been obtained in one run. You can also check that the residual forces are lower than 5.0d-4. Convergence issues are discussed in section 6 of the abinit help file, on numerical quality. You should read it. By the way, you have read many parts of the abinit help file! You are missing the sections (or part of) 2, 5, 6.

You are also missing the description of many input variables. We suggest that you finish reading entirely the abinit help file now, while the knowledge of the input variables will come in the long run.

2.1.b Many convergence parameters have already been identified. We will focus only on ecut and acell. This is because

• the convergence of the SCF cycle and geometry determination are well under control thanks to toldfe, toldff and tolmxf (this might not be the case for other physical properties)

• there is no k point convergence study to be done for an isolated system in a big box: no additional information is gained by adding a k-point beyond one

• the boxcut value (see boxcutmin) is automatically chosen larger than 2 by ABINIT, see the determination of the input variable ngfft by preprocessing

• we are using ionmov = 2 for the determination of the geometry.

The output results in $ABI_TESTS/tutorial/Refs/tbase2_3.abo are as follows:  etotal11 -1.1305202335E+00 etotal12 -4.8429570903E-01 etotal21 -1.1182883137E+00 etotal22 -4.7393103688E-01 etotal31 -1.1165450484E+00 etotal32 -4.7158917506E-01 etotal41 -1.1165327748E+00 etotal42 -4.7136118536E-01 etotal51 -1.1167740301E+00 etotal52 -4.7128698890E-01 etotal61 -1.1168374331E+00 etotal62 -4.7129589330E-01 xcart11 -7.6471149217E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.6471149217E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart12 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart21 -7.4307169181E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.4307169181E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart22 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart31 -7.3778405090E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.3778405090E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart32 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart41 -7.3794243127E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.3794243127E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart42 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart51 -7.3742475720E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.3742475720E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart52 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart61 -7.3733248368E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 7.3733248368E-01 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 xcart62 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00 0.0000000000E+00  The corresponding atomisation energies and interatomic distances are: acell (Bohr) atomisation energy (Ha) interatomic distance (Bohr) 8 .1619 1.529 10 .1704 1.486 12 .1734 1.476 14 .1738 1.478 16 .1742 1.475 18 .1742 1.475 In order to reach 0.2% convergence on the atomisation energy and interatomic distance one needs acell 16 16 16. We will use acell 16 16 16 for the final run. For most solids the size of the unit cell will be smaller than that. We are treating a lot of vacuum in this supercell ! So, the H$_2$ study, with this pseudopotential, turns out to be not really easy. Of course, the number of states to be treated is minimal! This allows to have reasonable CPU time still. ## 5 The final calculation in Local (Spin) Density Approximation¶ We now use the correct values of both ecut and acell. Well, you should modify the tbase2_3.abi file to make a calculation with acell 16 16 16 and ecut 25. You can still use the double loop feature with udtset 1 2 (which reduces to a single loop), to minimize the modifications to the file. The file$ABI_TESTS/tutorial/Input/tbase2_4.abi can be taken as an example of input file:

while \$ABI_TESTS/tutorial/Refs/tbase2_4.abo is as an example of output file:

Since we are doing the calculation at a single (ecut, acell) pair, the total CPU time is not as much as for the previous determinations of optimal values through series calculations. However, the memory needs have still increased a bit.

The output data are:

       etotal11   -1.1369766875E+00
etotal12   -4.7827555035E-01

xcart11   -7.2259811794E-01  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00
7.2259811794E-01  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00
xcart12    0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00

• The corresponding atomisation energy is 0.1804 Ha = 4.910 eV
• The interatomic distance is 1.445 Bohr.
• These are our final data for the local (spin) density approximation.

Witou our choice of pseudopotential, the value of ixc was -1012, corresponding to the Perdew-Wang [Perdew1992a] parameterization of the LDA XC functional. It is in principle the same as using ixc = 1. Other expressions for the local (spin) density approximation ixc=[2, 3 … 7] are possible. The values 1, 2, 3 and 7 should give about the same results, since they all start from the XC energy of the homogeneous electron gas, as determined by Quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Other possibilities (ixc = 4, 5, 6) are older local density functionals, that could not rely on these data.

## 6 The use of the Generalized Gradient Approximation¶

We will use the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional proposed in [Perdew1996]

For GGA, we use another pseudopotential than for LDA. In principle we should redo the ecut convergence test, possibly coming to the conclusion that another value of ecut should be use. However, for the special case of Hydrogen, and in general pseudopotentials with a very small core (including only the 1s orbital), pseudopotentials issued from the LDA and from the GGA are very similar. So, we will not redo an ecut convergence test.

Important

ecut is often characteristic of the pseudopotentials that are used in a calculation.

Independently of the pseudopotential, an acell convergence test should not be done again, since the vacuum is treated similarly in LDA or GGA.

So, our final values within GGA will be easily obtained by changing the pseudopotential with respect to the one used in tbase2_4.abi.

       etotal11   -1.1658082573E+00
etotal12   -4.9940910146E-01

xcart11   -7.0870975055E-01 -2.3009273766E-32 -6.6702161522E-32
7.0870975055E-01  2.3009273766E-32  6.6702161522E-32
xcart12    0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00  0.0000000000E+00

• The corresponding atomisation energy is 0.1670 Ha = 4.544 eV
• The interatomic distance is 1.417 Bohr.
• These are our final data for the generalized gradient approximation.

Once more, here are the experimental data:

• bond length: 1.401 Bohr
• atomisation energy: 4.747 eV

In GGA, we are within 2% of the experimental bond length, but 5% of the experimental atomisation energy. In LDA, we were within 3% of the experimental bond length, and about 3.5% of the experimental atomisation energy.

Important

Do not forget that the typical accuracy of LDA and GGA varies with the class of materials studied. Usually, LDA gives too small lattice parameters, by 1…3%, while GGA gives too large lattice parameters, by 1…3% as well, but there might be classes of materials for which the deviation is larger. See e.g. [Lejaeghere2014].